首页> 外文OA文献 >Ad fontes – back to Scripture, or to Jesus, or to dogma?
【2h】

Ad fontes – back to Scripture, or to Jesus, or to dogma?

机译:广告 - 回到圣经,回到耶稣,还是教条?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A critical approach to the New Testament, its origins, and the development of theological trajectories in the early Jesus movements have caused historians to look for the foundational authority beyond the biblical canon as the decisive authority of Christianity. Some have indicated Jesus as the primary authority for the earliest followers of Jesus. Others have identified doctrinal traditions as authoritative before the canon was finally established. This study challenges the church as institution to consider a foundational authority beyond the written and canonised Scripture as a normative source for Christian faith and life.
机译:对新约,它的起源以及早期耶稣运动中神学轨迹的发展采取批判性方法,使得历史学家寻求圣经权威以外的基础权威作为基督教的决定性权威。有些人指出耶稣是最早的耶稣信徒的主要权威。其他人在教规最终建立之前就已经确定了教义传统。这项研究对教会这一机构提出了挑战,即要考虑将超越圣经和经典的圣经的基本权威视为基督教信仰和生活的规范依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号